I have extensive experience in all areas of family law and handle a variety of cases and clients. Areas of work I focus on include: divorce, financial matters, injunctions, private law children, cohabitation issues and marriage contracts. My specialty is denfights. I am also a member of the Law Society`s Family Law Committee and the Advanced Family Law Committee, which focuses on violence in family and financial proceedings. Suppose that A, B and C are all parties to the same dispute, with A being the plaintiff and B and C being the co-defendants. If A is satisfied with B but pursues the claim against C, can the injurious communications that led to the settlement between A and B be cited as evidence in the ongoing dispute between A and C? The answer lies in the House of Lords decision in Rush & Tompkins -v- GLC17. Rush & Tompkins (a contractor company) was involved in a dispute with GLC and a second defendant and eventually reached an agreement with GLC through damaging negotiations. The House of Lords held that the content of these hearings could not be disclosed to the second defendant. Doing something else would discourage parties in multi-party disputes from trying to reach a real agreement. Lord Griffiths explained: “Companies often use unbiased conversations to discuss the extent of compensation offered under a settlement agreement. If a dispute cannot be resolved, everything that has been said during that conversation cannot legally be used to “compromise” the position of either party. A communication (written or oral1) must be made in the context of genuine settlement negotiations in order to be “without prejudice”.
It is not enough to label a document “without prejudice”. The circumstances must be taken into account when deciding whether protection should apply. “Without prejudice, there is no label that can be used indiscriminately to immunize an act from its normal legal consequences when there is no real litigation or negotiation.” 2 I acted on behalf of a US client specialising in the sterilisation of medical equipment supplied by the NHS and other medical providers in connection with the purchase of land from Henry Boot Developments Limited and the subsequent development contract. be used for construction. a bespoke factory worth over £10 million.  In the case of a written document, it must be clearly marked with the words “without prejudice” or “without prejudice and subject to contract”. As a result, a settlement agreement was reached between BGC and the broker. The settlement agreement is important: all aspects of private family law: divorce, disputes relating to children, financial issues arising from the breakdown of the relationship, marriage contracts, cohabitation agreements. Advise clients in often emotionally charged situations, from negotiations to complex legal proceedings, and tailor my service to the needs of each client.
So in an unbiased conversation, if your employer raises an issue with you that could violate trust, you can`t use it against them. In any discussion or meeting if any, it is best to mention this at the beginning – see also the next section on this subject – and to obtain confirmation from the other party that they agree that the communication will not be affected. I lead the Corporate and Trading department and oversee a number of corporate (e.B transactions. sales and acquisitions of companies/enterprises) and restructuring works (e.B divisions and shareholder agreements) as well as a wide range of commercial contracts (e.B. agency, franchising, sales, IT, intellectual property contracts up to the terms and conditions of sale/ purchase). . . .